Banking on corruption
Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:00
Some of the world's biggest banks have been dealing with some of the
world's most corrupt regimes, London-based NGO Global Witness said in a
report published on Wednesday.
By doing so, the banks had facilitated corruption and looting of
natural resource revenues, denying some of the world's poorest people a
chance to escape poverty, the organisation said.
"The same lax regulation that created the credit crunch has let some
of the world's biggest banks facilitate the looting of natural resource
wealth from poor countries," said Gavin Hayman, Global Witness
campaigns director.
"If resources like oil, gas and minerals are to truly help lift
Africa and other poor regions out of poverty, then governments must
take responsibility to stop banks doing business with corrupt dictators
and their families," he said.
Undue Diligence
Global Witness's report, entitled Undue Diligence, claims that banks
have kept accounts open for dictators' families, despite evidence of
the looting of state revenues.
The report also alleges that banks have funded civil wars in Africa.
According to Global Witness, no bank should be, or should want to
be, involved in business whose real costs are borne by the people of
some of the world's poorest countries.
"Anti-money laundering laws require banks to do due diligence to
identify their customer and turn down illicitly-acquired funds, but
these laws need tightening to make them globally effective. "
It suggested that banks should change their culture of "due
diligence" ? the process by which they check that a customer is
legitimate.
"This isn't about box ticking... banks should only take the
business if they have identified an ultimate beneficiary who does not
pose a corruption risk," the NGO said.
The organisation said that co-operation between governments had to
improve to ensure that national bank regulations became globally
compatible, accountable and transparent, and were not hindered by bank
secrecy laws.
Anti-money laundering regime
"This must begin with reforms to the intergovernmental body that
oversees the anti-money laundering regime, the Financial Action Task
Force."
Governments had to also ensure that new global rules were put in
place to help banks avoid corrupt funds.
The most important change was to ensure that every country produced
full public online registers of the ultimate beneficial ownership of
all companies and trusts under its jurisdiction, to help banks identify
and avoid business with a corruption risk.
"The G20 leaders must act on their promises to help the world's
poor... a key element of making poverty history is to stop the money
being stolen or kept off-budget in the first place," Hayman said.
"Ducking this issue now leaves the global financial system open not
only to further corrupt money flows, but to the destabilising
influences that have caused such damage to the developed world's
economies," he added.
"The developing world cannot afford a return to business as usual."
In 2003 Global Witness was co-nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize
for its leading work on conflict diamonds.