We were fortunate enough to speak with the well known economist Ed Dolan on various energy and economic issues.
In the interview Ed talks about the following:
- Why cheap energy is not vital to economic growth.
- Why high oil prices aren't necessarily a bad thing.
- Why the US oil and gas boom is hurting Russia's global influence.
- Why Obama's desire to cut oil industry tax breaks could be a great idea.
- Why energy policy needs to be completely reformed.
- Why Russia's Arctic Exploration could cause the worst environmental disaster to date.
- Why renewable energy investors should be very worried about the natural gas boom.
- Why the EU was flawed from the start.
- Why subsidies for renewables are just plain wrong.
- Why we should give QE3 a chance.
- Why abundant natural resources can bring a curse of riches.
Ed writes the popular economics blog Ed Dolan's Econ Blog and has just recently released a book: TANSTAAFL (There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch) — A Libertarian Perspective on Environmental Policy, which you can find out more about here.
James Stafford: Access to cheap energy is vital to economic growth. What do you see happening with the economy over the coming years as the time of cheap oil comes to an end?
Ed Dolan: In my view it is a myth that cheap energy — "affordable energy" as many people like to say — is vital to growth. The idea that there is a lockstep relationship between growth of GDP and use of energy is widespread, but the data simply does not bear it out. Instead, what they show is that the world's best-performing economies have become dramatically more energy efficient over time.
The World Bank uses constant-dollar GDP per kg of oil equivalent as an energy efficiency metric. From 1980 to 2010, the high-income countries in the OECD have increased their average energy efficiency by 55 percent. The United States has done a little better than that, increasing its energy efficiency by 81 percent over that period. That's pretty remarkable, considering that we haven't really had a policy environment that is supportive of efficiency.
Think what we could do if we did.
Even after the gains in efficiency we have made, we still have a long way to go. The US economy is still 15 percent less energy efficient than the average for high-income OECD countries, giving it plenty of room to improve. Switzerland is almost twice as energy-efficient as the US, and the UK is 68 percent more efficient.
Some people say that the only reason the United States has been able to grow while using less energy is the deindustrialization of its economy, outsourcing heavy industry to China. However, compare the US with Germany. Germany is an export powerhouse and Europe's best-performing economy, yet its energy efficiency has increased at almost the same rate over the last 30 years as the United States, an 80 percent gain in efficiency compared to 81 percent. Furthermore, despite being proportionately more industrialized than the US and a major exporter, Germany squeezes out 41 percent more GDP from each kg of oil equivalent.
In short, we don't have to hypothesize about the possibility of someday breaking the lockstep relationship of growth and energy use; we and most of the rest of the advanced world are already doing it.
Article continues on pages two, three, four and five...